Learning Intention:

To understand that environmental issues have no simple solutions

​

Background Information: 

When looking at environmental issues a lot of the time people can lean towards one idea initially and stick to it without listening to the argument from the other side. For example, switching from coal mining to renewable energy. Most people side with switching to renewable energy, which is fine, but it is also important to acknowledge the other side. If you cannot justify your position based on the opposing arguments, does your opinion have value?

​

This activity will focus on how to develop an argument and rebut opposing perspectives. Even if you do not agree with the side you're on, knowing how to empathise with a contrasting view is key to developing the ability to think critically.

Part 1:

​

1. The first activity is to split into groups based on what the class decided were stakeholders for nurdles in activity 4. Then taking on the role of the group you are in you will explore the following topic: 'Australia is debating if the production of plastic should be done all in house, by importing zero plastics, in an effort to remove nurdles from entering the environment'
   
   You need to research and decide on the key arguments for your party, but also look at what arguments the opposing side could plan as a rebuttal. If your group has a side which does not have an agenda you do the following:
   
   Scientists: research the issue based on effects on the environment
   
   Government: effect on the country, both for and against, you have no opinion on the issue until everyone has presented. Look at the economy, jobs, etc.
   
   It might be helpful before starting research to brainstorm what arguments you already know, then start researching to find evidence.

​

Part 2:

In your groups, you will then present key ideas to the class also incorporating a rebuttal based on your guess as to what an argument from the opposing side would be.

Everyone is required to present one key idea with supporting evidence.

Presenting order:

1. Government - presents effects on the country

2. Scientists

3. People 'For' topic

4. People 'Against' topic

5. Government - decides what their action would be, whom they side with

 

Part 3:

Reflect on everyone’s presentation, think about:

• Who had the best points

• Why their points were effective

• What was something someone said that changed the way you think? And why?

Part 4:

As a class discuss what the solutions to this issue are. ​